We would need evidence that rock layers can somehow form in years…We would need evidence you can reset atomic clocks and keep neutrons from becoming protons. That exchange summed up more than two and a half hours of debate over science and the nature of human life, and the fundamental cleavage between creationism and science. Science requires the idea that a hypothesis can fail, that what is held to be true can be disproven. The central hypothesis of creationism, in the eyes of the creationist, can never be disproven, no matter the quality, quantity, or immutability of the available information.
Click here for pdf version The doctrine of coincidentia oppositorum, the interpenetration, interdependence and unification of opposites has long been one of the defining characteristics of mystical as opposed to philosophical thought.
Hegel have held that presumed polarities in thought do not exclude one another but are actually necessary conditions for the assertion of their opposites. It is the achievement of Elior  and other modern scholars of Jewish mysticism to have brought the Chasidic use of the coincidentia doctrine to our attention.
The first, cartographic model, draws upon the idea that seemingly contradictory but actually complementary cartographic representations are necessary in order to provide an accurate two-dimensional representation or map of a spherical world.
The second, linguistic model, draws upon Kabbalistic and postmodern views on the relationship between language and the world, and in particular the necessity of regarding the linguistic sign as both identical to and distinct from the thing signified it is said to represent. In the course of my discussion, I hope to provide some insights into the relevance of coincidentia oppositorum to contemporary philosophical, psychological, and especially, theological concerns.
A depth of good, a depth of evil. A depth of above, a depth of Creation doctrine essay, A depth of east, a depth Creation doctrine essay west. A depth of north, a depth of south. For if they did not possess the power of synthesis, there would be no energy in anything.
For that which is light is not dark and that which is darkness is not-light. Even though they may be multifarious, their source is one, either in thesis or antithesis.
Know that before the emanation of the emanated and the creation of all that was created, the simple Upper Light filled all of reality…but everything was one simple light, equal in one hashvaah, which is called the Light of the Infinite. Indeed, each of the major Lurianic symbols expresses a coincidence of opposites between ideas that are thought to contradict one another in ordinary thought and discourse.
In the symbol of Tzimtzum the withdrawal, concealment and contraction of the infinite that gives rise to the world there is a coincidence of opposites between the positive acts of creation and revelation and the negative acts of concealment, contraction and withdrawal.
By concealing its absolute unity Ein-sof gives rise to a finite and highly differentiated world. Thus in the symbol of Tzimtzum there is a coincidence of opposites between addition and subtraction, creation and negation, concealment and revelation.
In order to comprehend the notion of Tzimtzum, one simultaneously think two thoughts, for example, one thought pertaining to divine concealment and a second pertaining to this concealment as creation and revelation.
|Theological Triage and the Doctrine of Creation||The Existence of God A.|
|Customers who bought this item also bought||The human mind can hardly remain entirely free from bias, and decisive opinions are often formed before a thorough examination of a subject from all its aspects has been made.|
|The creation stories in Genesis||May a Christian believer accept theistic or organic evolution rather than the doctrine of creation? Is the Genesis account of creation literal history and fact, or is it figurative myth and legend?|
|Owen Catering - Catering for all Occasions in South East Wales||Reading the situation charitably, I can understand the concerns, even suspicions, of old-earth and young-earth creationists when challenged by their opponents. In the early 20th century, the creation-versus-evolution debates served as a dividing line in the modernist-fundamentalist controversy.|
|Trinity and Creation: Two Distributed Doctrines||This essay is the third of three. The first can be read herethe second here.|
The symbols of Ein-sof, Shevirah rupture and Tikkun Repair thus express a coincidence of opposites between the presumably opposing views that God is the creator and foundation of humanity and humanity is the creator and foundation of God. The Unification of Opposites as the Purpose of the World The doctrine of coincidentia oppositorum, which is an important if not dominant theme in the Kabbalah, achieves its fullest Jewish expression in the philosophy of the Chabad Hasidim, where it becomes the governing principle for both God and the world.
For Chabad, all things, both infinite and finite, involve a unity or coincidence of opposites. These Chasidim held that the very purpose of creation was the revelation of these opposites, precisely in order that they should be articulated and then overcome.
One of the early Chabad thinkers, R. Consequently to know, or, in other words, to comprehend an object is equivalent to being conscious of it as a concrete unity of opposed determinations.
As put by the founder of the Chabad movement, Schneur Zalman of Lyadi Looking upwards from below, as it appears to eyes of flesh, the tangible world seems to be Yesh and a thing, while spirituality, which is above, is an aspect of Ayin nothingness.
But looking downwards from above the world is an aspect of Ayin, and everything which is linked downwards and descends lower and lower is more and more Ayin and is considered as naught truly as nothing and null.
For Chabad, it is indeed simultaneously true that God is the one reality that creates an illusory world, and that the world, in particular humankind, is the one reality that gives actuality to an otherwise empty, if not illusory, God.
In this they were in accord with the early Chasidic leader, the Maggid of Mezrichwho held that while God is the foundation of all ideas, the very significance of divine thought is contingent upon its making its appearance in the mind of man. For the Maggid, God is the source of thought but actual thinking can only occur within the framework of the human mind.
Hasidic thought is strained to the ultimate stage in a dialectical way; just as there is no separate reality and no discriminative essence in the world without God, so also God has no revealed and discriminate existence without the world, that is, just as one cannot speak of the existence of the world without God, so too one cannot speak of the existence of God without the world.
Schneur Zalman held that the very meaning of the cosmos involves a dialectical movement from non-being to being and back to nothingness. According to Rabbi Aaron Ha Levi it is the basic divine purpose that the world should be differentiated and revealed in each of its finite particulars and yet united in a single infinite source.
Ein-sof, which is initially actually nothing but potentially all things, differentiates and actualizes itself into each of the innumerable manifestations of a finite world.
It does so precisely in order that these finite entities can actualize the sefirotic values e. By instantiating these intellectual, spiritual, ethical and aesthetic values, the entities of the finite world i. From another perspective, humanity actually constitutes the source of all value, the infinite, Ein-sof, and in this way achieves unity with the divine.
For this reason, a world that is alienated from and then reunited with God is superior to one that had never been alienated or divided at all. Schneur Zalman implores his followers both to nullify bittul the self and matter in favor of the Godhead and to bring about the infusion of the divine will into the material world through religious worship and the performance of divine mitzvoth commandments.
According to Schneur Zalman: One seeks to leave its sheath of bodily material. The second is the… aspect of the drawing down of the divinity from above precisely in the various vessels in Torah and the commandments.
It is thus through a doctrine of the coincidence of opposites that Chabad is able to combine the opposing principles of mystical quietism and an active concern with the material world. Although Schneur Zalman and others in the Chabad movement make such acosmic pronouncements as:Sam Emadi considers what a theological triage on the doctrine of creation looks like and proposes 7 first-order points.
Dogma and Preaching: Applying Christian Doctrine to Daily Life [Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI] on timberdesignmag.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This volume is an unabridged edition of Dogma and Preaching, a work that appeared in a much-reduced form in English.
Join PhoeniciaOrg Twitter for alerts on new articles: Visit our Facebook Page for additional, new studies: The Phoenician creation story is another account of creation which most religions attempt to answer.
New Kabbalah Home. Back to "Articles" The Doctrine of Coincidentia Oppositorum in Jewish Mysticism. Sanford L. Drob. Click here for pdf version The doctrine of coincidentia oppositorum, the interpenetration, interdependence and unification of opposites has long been one of the defining characteristics of mystical (as opposed to philosophical) thought.
THE DOCTRINE OF FASCISM. BENITO MUSSOLINI () (ONLY COMPLETE OFFICIAL TEXT ON THE INTERNET) (This article, co-written by Giovanni Gentile, is considered to be the most complete articulation of Mussolini's political views.
2. Atheism as nature worship or neo-paganism. By “nature worship” and “neo-paganism” I refer to the atheist’s tendency to replace a sense of awe of God and seeking transcendence by relating to God with seeking awe and transcendence in nature.