She has also exercised considerable influence on many of the most important authors warning us about the Islamization of Europe, including Daniel Pipes, Niall Ferguson, Robert Spencer, and Bernard Lewis. The EEC perceived that such cooperation would bring about economic benefits for Europe from "expanded oil, commercial, and industrial markets", which included the "massive sales of arms, as well as of industrial and nuclear equipment" [i]. A PAEAC meeting in Strasbourg, Junerecognised the "historical contribution of Arab culture to European development" and discussed "the contribution that the European countries can still expect from Arab culture, notably in the area of human values". The provision of the "means", created by the Arab countries, to enable Arab immigrants "to participate in Arab cultural and religious life" in their respective European host countries was also deliberated, and included the propagation of Islam and the Arab culture throughout Europe [ii].
Arguably, the two firmly committed poles here are just getting more entrenched. As John says, I do think most internet atheists are unacquainted with the best arguments both against and for their position.
For the most part, this turns on tribal identify and personality more than reasoned debate. Here is an argument that I think may have convinced me of the opposite of what John seems to mean here: One way to restate Francis Fukuyama's "End of History" thesis is that, at the end of the Cold War, the proponents of liberal democracy finally convinced everybody in the West, except for a few cranks, that democracy is irresistible in the long run.
If democracy is not a universal imperative, however, then it is everywhere contingent. In other words, if it is not compatible with the current culture of Eurabia thesis Middle East, then one could imagine situations arising in the West in which it would not be compatible, either.
At the moment, no argues anything like this, except in the context of judicial review. Nonetheless, we cannot dismiss the prospect that "realism" will spread to domestic politics.
It has long been assumed that religion is Eurabia thesis to science, reason and human progress; and the death of gods is simply taken for granted as a deeply ingrained Darwinian article of faith Why, then, are the enlightened so conspicuously up in arms these days, reiterating every possible argument against the existence of God?
The most obvious answer is that the armies of disbelief have been provoked A deeper and far more unsettling answer, however, is that the popularity of the current counterattack on religion cloaks a renewed and intense anxiety within secular society that it is not the story of religion but rather the story of the Enlightenment that may be more illusory than real The Enlightenment story has its own version of Genesis, and the themes are well known: Unfortunately, as a theory of history, that story has had a predictive utility of approximately zero.
At the turn of the millennium it was pretty hard not to notice that the 20th century was probably the worst one yet, and that the big causes of all the death and destruction had rather little to do with religion.
Science has not replaced religion; group loyalties have intensified, not eroded. There are sophisticated arguments for atheism, but the scientists who take up iconoclasm as a hobby rarely seem to be aware of them.
At least in part, that may be because the sophisticated arguments involve the sort of fundamental skepticism that would also undermine the optimistic epistemology on which the scientific enterprise depends. The fact of the matter is that the snob right in Britain, the Max Hastings crowd, who denounce American adventurism in Iraq and all this, the Michael Moore conservatives as they are sometimes known over here, basically their argument - that George W.
And to airily make that statement about Iraq and not to see its implications for your own country is almost unbelievably crass. The Supreme Court hears arguments this week in a case that could determine whether the Bush administration must change course in how it deals with the threat of global warming The case is Massachusetts v.
Environmental Protection Agency, A dozen states as well as environmental groups and large cities are trying to convince the court that the Environmental Protection Agency must regulate, as a matter of public health, the amount of carbon dioxide that comes from vehicles. This suit illustrates why it was so important for the United States not to sign the Kyoto Treaty.
Wade did for population control. As we have noted before, uncontrolled illegal immigration has already re-created significant pockets of indentured servitude in sweatshop industries, and then there are the poor slave-nannies who dare not complain to authorities no matter how their employers treat them.
The wait for a kidney can stretch for years. People die waiting for one -- more than 4, in the United States alone last year. Legalizing the process, he says, would end a black market for the organs. The key, Franklin says, would be "a robust system of regulation.
The characters walk into a deli in New New York in the 31st century and see the food available from all across the galaxy.
One of them says:This is an excellent book to be used to open the eyes of all Americans that place a high standard on the the American culture that has made the United States the most successful and yet . In my talks on the impact of al Durah, and how his image mainstreamed the comparison of the Israelis to the Nazis, I point to this banner in Paris.
Place de la République, October 6, And this comment by Catherine Nay (against a graphic background provided by International ANSWER. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes.
Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate.
Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis [Bat Ye'or] on timberdesignmag.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This book is about the transformation of Europe into 'Eurabia', a cultural and political appendage of the Arab/Muslim world. Eurabia is fundamentally anti-Christian.
[Eurabia] is a project that was conceived, planned and pursued consistently through immigration policy, propaganda, church support, economic associations and aid, cultural, media and academic collaboration.
Generations grew up within this political framework; they were educated and conditioned to support it and go along with it. ABSTRACT. For over years grave fears have been expressed concerning the earth’s capacity to cope with an exponential population growth. It is obvious that the calamitous famines and widespread starvation repeatedly forecast over the last years, have never eventuated.